客服中心 | 代理专区 | 网站地图 | 公司简介
当前位置:亿城英语 -> 英语听力大全 -> 2004 -> VOA标准英语 -> 时事新闻 -> Analysts Say Establishing Security


 

By Ed Warner

Nasyr Shansab, an Afghan of average size and amiable disposition, was working at his desk at his home in Kabul when three strangers at it. They demanded $20,000 or else. Anticipating attack, Mr. Shansab moved first, striking one who toppled on another. He pushed the third out the door only to have him draw a revolver. Fortunately, a friend had just arrived and grabbed the assailant. All three intruders then fled their failed mission.

Mr. Shansab describes the aftermath: "We threw them out of the house and then after that, when it was reported to the police, nobody claimed that they knew them or who they were. I don't think anything happened, and the expectation is that nothing will happen because sometimes at least part of the police might be working together with those people."

Mr. Shansab, a leading Afghan businessman, says he now has a guard and a gun.

As this incident suggests, security remains uncertain in Kabul, even more so in the rest of the country. And security is the key, adds Mr. Shansab's son, Horace, who is making a film about a family living in Afghanistan under Taleban rule. Without personal safety assured, he says, businesses will not come to the country. It cannot be rebuilt if people fear for their lives.

Rule of law must take over Afghanistan, says Horace Shansab. "People must respect the law and fear the consequences of being unlawful," he says. "There must be an enforcer. There has to be an army that the central government can call up to go enforce the law. Otherwise, 99 percent of Afghanistan will be a lawless land, the wild east, and there will be a small bastion of security in Kabul."

But establishing this security is problematic, says Nasyr Shansab. Power still rests largely with the so-called warlords and they are not inclined to surrender it, despite the pleas of the central government.

"Nothing has changed in the internal power structure in Afghanistan," he says. "The warlords -- the people who had power after Communism fell in Afghanistan -- are still in power. Their word is still the law."

A law that is hard to break, says Edmund McWilliams, former U.S. special envoy to Afghanistan. "At the moment warlords are still largely in control of most of the countryside," he notes. "That means they are not going to respond to President Karzai's direction, but rather to their own financial interests and power interests."

One of the most powerful warlords sits undisturbed in Kabul. He is Defense Minister Mohammed Fahim, who controls what is considered the largest private militia in Afghanistan. It would be a major task to disarm him, says Nasyr Shansab. "As far as I can judge, the police, the secret police and most of the military units in Kabul and around Kabul are under his command and belong to his organizations and the Northern Alliance. From that point of view, he is the most powerful man in Kabul and the surroundings," he says.

The Karzai Government made a determined effort to remove one important warlord, Ismael Khan, in the province of Herat, which has close ties to Iran. The government claims success, but that is disputed by others who say Mr. Khan remains largely in control, enjoying the proceeds from cross-border trade with Iran.

Mr. McWilliams says Khan is more than a man with a gun. "He is a very significant warlord and something more of a political figure as well as a warlord because he does have some local backing in the Herat area. He has long roots there," he says.

Part of the warlords' power rests on the flourishing drug trade. Afghanistan is now said to supply 80% of the world's opium -- the nation's biggest industry and a source of livelihood for its farmers. U.S. ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad says Afghanistan has the potential of becoming a narco-state.

Edmund McWilliams thinks U.S. and NATO forces, with control of the roads, could reduce the drug traffic. But the will may be lacking. The West has other distractions, say analysts, and nation building in Afghanistan is not a top priority.

For focus, this is Ed Warner.

注释:
amiable 亲切的,和蔼可亲的
disposition 性情,脾气
assailant 攻击者
intruder 入侵者
aftermath 结果,后果
take over 接管
consequence 结果
bastion 堡垒
problematic 有问题的,有疑问的
surrender 交出,放弃
envoy 外交使节
proceeds 收益
flourishing 欣欣向荣的
opium 鸦片
livelihood 生计,谋生



声明:
这里只提供从网络公开资源收集的低精度英语听力和英语口语语音试听,完全免费供广大英语爱好者试用。我们不保证文章内容一定是完整和正确的。您如需要完整和高精度的语音产品,请在相应的音像书店购买正版产品和教材。除标明的外,这里的语音内容的版权属于原版权所有人。如果试学感觉好,请支持正版!英语听力部分页面可能缺少文本或者语音,请反馈到客服信箱;文字内容仅供英语学习者参考,英语听力音频内容仅供低精度在线试听(不提供下载)。若您打开页面后看不到Realplayer播放框,有可能是没有安装Realplayer播放器,请点这里下载并安装。





北京数码轻舟科技发展有限公司版权所有 ICP京050055号 客服电话:(010)62535917
地址:北京市海淀区成府路35号北楼119室 邮编:100083 传真:(010)62535917
联系我们: 客服邮箱: